Showing posts with label Spam and E-Mail Hoaxes. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spam and E-Mail Hoaxes. Show all posts

Just another hoax: Money Bags

by Glenn Littrell (archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
hoax 
This one gets re-circulated every month except with the month changed…just look at your calendar to verify its a hoax and stop circulating this. We’re like a bunch of ‘monkey see, monkey post’ idiots. This hoax may seem harmless, but we do the same thing with untrue religious diatribes, political lies, and just plain hateful, ignorant, crap. Fact check something every now and then before you post. Being gullible isn’t an excuse for spreading lies.   GlennDL
URBAN LEGENDS:     FALSEFacebook Hoax: Graphic App Privacy Setting         “This phenomenon is not called "money bags." It's not unusual at all, let alone something that happens only "once every 823 years," for a given month to have 5 Fridays, 5 Saturdays, and 5 Sundays. It's true of any 31-day month that begins on a Friday, in fact. The last time it happened was July 2011. The next time it will happen is August 2014. On average it occurs once a year. And it has nothing whatsoever to do with Feng Shui…”    http://urbanlegends.about.com/b/2013/03/19/enough-with-the-money-bags-nonsense.htm
SNOPES:        FALSE       http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/trivia/fivedays.asp
WAFFLESATNOON:         FALSE        http://wafflesatnoon.com/2012/09/20/does-this-month-only-repeat-every-823-years/
FARMERS ALMANAC:        FALSE           “…But the problems don’t stop there. Every month that has 31 days will include three days of the week five times. For those three days to to be Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, all it takes is for the first day of the month to fall on a Friday. This happens far more often than once every 823 years. Since the days of the week cycle forward one day each year, it would theoretically happen once every seven years for a specific month. Leap years throw that model somewhat into disarray, though…”     http://www.farmersalmanac.com/blog/2011/10/03/will-october-mean-money-bags/

Graphic App: IT’S A HOAX'

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
“Whatever you do, don't rely on the instructions given in the viraFacebook Hoax: Graphic App Privacy Settingl alert, which are laughably wrong and misleading. All you'll accomplish is blocking some of your friends' updates from appearing on your timeline (or yours on theirs). It will not prevent your (or their) content from appearing in Graph Search or being otherwise visible to the public at large.”
URBAN LEGENDS:   Analysis: This is an old viral alert (circulating since 2011) revised to include a reference to Facebook's new Graph Search (mislabeled "Graph App" or "Graphic App") function.
The text is largely inaccurate and gives incorrect advice on adjusting privacy settings.
Contrary to what's claimed, Graph Search won't make any of your Facebook content or other activities visible to strangers unless they're already visible to the general public per your own privacy settings. It simply gives members another way to find your stuff.   
more at:
http://urbanlegends.about.com/od/facebook/ss/Facebook-Graph-App-And-Privacy.htm
GRAHAM CLULEY:   The truth is that there is no such thing as “Graphic App”, and the material you post on Facebook is viewable by others based upon the sharing settings you have chosen, just as it has always been.
Versions of this inaccurate privacy scare have been circulating for some time, but this latest version appears to have been inspired by Facebook’s recent rolling out of its “Graph Search” facility.
Graph Search makes it
easier for people to find content that has been shared on the social network through the use of natural language and filters.
The good news is that Graph Search doesn’t make anything you have shared on Facebook any more public than it was before.
The bad news, though, is that it does provide a much easier way to dig up information that might otherwise have been overlooked or hard for others to dig out of your Facebook history.
more at:   
http://grahamcluley.com/2013/07/facebook-graphic-app-privacy-hoax/
HOAX SLAYER:   Brief Analysis:   The claims in the message are total nonsense. There is no such thing as a "graphic app". This is apparently a misguided reference to Facebook's new Graph Search functionality. Graph Search does not change existing privacy settings. Following the instructions in the message will do nothing other than stop you from seeing much of what your friends are doing on Facebook and stop them from seeing what you are doing as well.  You can control who can see what you post via Facebook's Privacy Settings. Posting this false and misleading information will do nothing whatsoever to protect your privacy.  more at:   http://www.hoax-slayer.com/graphic-app-facebook-hoax.shtml
THE NEW NEXUS 7:   If the Facebook post below: "Facebook has changed their privacy settings once more! Due to the new 'graphic app / graph app'", is posted on your Facebook Wall or Timeline, please delete it because it is a hoax. The post is misleading and if you follow the instructions in it, you may prevent your friends from seeing what you have posted or it may prevent you from seeing what your friends have posted.    more at:    http://www.onlinethreatalerts.com/article/2013/7/20/facebook-hoax-graphic-app-privacy-setting/
THE RAPPLER:               MANILA, Philippines - Rappler readers and Facebook users sent out warning of a hoax making the rounds on social media.  The hoax, which is based on the fear of having people you don't want seeing your posts and photos because of a "graphic app," is a fabrication. While the hoax has been worded a number of different ways, the intent is the same: to misinform and cause you to waste time disabling your ability to see others' posts.
Ensuring your account's contents stay private yet readable by the people you trust is an easy process though.   more at:    
http://www.rappler.com/life-and-style/technology/34056-avoid-facebook-graph-search-hoax
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hoax Just another hoax, like this one that gets re-circulated every month except with the month changed…just look at your calendar people and stop circulating this. We’re like a bunch of ‘monkey see, monkey post’ idiots. We do it with religious diatribes, political lies, and just plain hateful, ignorant, crap. Fact check something every now and then before you post. Being gullible isn’t an excuse for spreading lies.   GlennDL
CataractFalls IN (107)crp




Cell Phones Go Public This Month: HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
It’s A HOAX:
reposted from August 7, 2011
image from SNOPES.com 
“Washington, DC -- For several years there has been a rumor circulating, mostly by e-mail, that a nationwide directory of cell phone numbers will be made available to telemarketers, and that consumers will start receiving telemarketing calls on their cell phones.
There is no truth to this rumor. Cell phone numbers are not being released to telemarketers, and you will not soon be getting telemarketing calls on your cell phone. FCC rules prohibit the use of auto dialers and prerecorded messages to call cell phones without the consumer’s consent.
Thus, most telemarketers are barred from contacting consumers on their cell phones.” 
source:  News Media Information FCC
Usually the phone number for calling the “Do not call list” is legitimate, so why does this hoax get perpetrated [circulating and updating since at least 2004]? Read my articles on “Spam & E-Mail Hoaxes”
Sources & References:graphic (8)
    • Cell Phones and The Do Not Call Registry:     “Despite viral email, there is no new cell phone database. Consumers may place their cell phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry to notify marketers that they don't want to get unsolicited telemarketing calls. The truth about cell phones and the Do Not Call Registry is:  1]The government is not releasing cell phone numbers to telemarketers…”
    • FTC FACTS for Consumers  “The Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) Telemarketing Sales Rule (TSR) puts consumers in charge of the number of telemarketing calls they get at home. The..”
    • National Do Not Call Registry     “Scammers have been making phone calls claiming to represent the National Do Not Call Registry. The calls claim to provide an opportunity to sign up for the Registry. These calls are not coming from the Registry or the Federal Trade Commission, and you should not respond to these calls. To add your number to the Registry you can call 888-382-1222 from the phone you wish to register, or go click on “Register a Phone Number” in the left column of this page. Your registration will not expire. Telephone numbers placed on the National Do Not Call Registry will remain on it permanently due to the Do-Not-Call Improvement Act of 2007, which became law in February 2008…”
    • Q&A: The National Do Not Call Registry 
cartoon1Glenn Littrell
The above was in response to the following e-mail:tu
----- Original Message -----REMEMBER THIS IS A HOAX-----
Cell Phones Go Public This Month:cellphone
Opt Out Information
all cell phone numbers are being released to telemarketing companies and you will start to receive sales calls.
YOU WILL BE CHARGED FOR THESE CALLS
To prevent this, call the following number from your cell phone:
888-382-1222.It is the National DO NOT CALL list -It will only take a minute of your time. It blocks your number for five (5) years. You must call from the cell phone number you want to have blocked. You cannot call from a different phone number.
HELP OTHERS BY PASSING THIS ON. 
It takes about 20 secondsanim (8)

Tax on all bank transactions: HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
Gary, kellyalm (3)
this is a hoax... it has nothing to do with Obama or Pelosi. read about it here:  http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp    This proposal has been around  since 2004 and is one of many that are suggested as an alternative to Income or payroll taxes, not in addition to. This particular bill has been introduced every congress by the same Rep. from Pennsylvania. He never gets anyone to sign on to it, it always dies and he resubmits it again and again. Harkin and DeFazio have nothing to do with it. The 'copied from Snopes...' reference is a copy of the summation of the hoax in its different forms not a copy of the truth about the hoax.
graphic The surprising thing is that when Obama's name is attached to it it gets negative attention, but when Obama or the Democrats try to pass legislation to stop the banks from doing the very same thing again and again people don't get mad at the banks or complain about corporate America screwing us they get mad at Obama and the Dems for trying 'regulate', so while we are complaining about big government big corporations are sticking it to us.
The above was in response to the following e-mail:tu
----- Original Message -----REMEMBER THIS IS A HOAX-----
From: Gary
To: undisclosed recipients
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2011 10:43 AM
Subject: Fw: Any Bank Transaction to cost 1% fee
Good Luck with this one.
1%  tax on all bank transactions HR 4646This  government just cannot think of enough ways to hurt the American people!
This Bill must die
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE  YOU KNOW!
1% tax on all bank transactions HR 4646 -
ANOTHER  NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP.
Checked this on snopes, it's true!
Check out HR 4646. (see below copied  from Snopes)
President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the  radar.
This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any  financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and  loans, etc.
Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your  account, will have a 1% tax charged.
~If your paycheck or  your social security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.
~If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of  depositing your paycheck in your bank.
Even if you hand carry your  paycheck or any check into your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be  charged.
~You receive a $5,000  stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you  to deposit that check in the bank
~If you take $1,000 cash to  deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.
Mind you, this is from  the man who promised that if you make under $250,000 per year, you  will not see one penny of new tax.
Keep your eyes and ears open,  you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's  under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are  taxed.
~Oh, and by the way, you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in  to deposit that check, you guessed it.
You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank.
Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will  pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.
Some will say, oh well,  it's just 1%. Are you kidding me?
It's a 1% tax increase across the board.
Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will.
And if anyone protests, they will just say, "oh,that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"!
Think this is no big deal?
Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year's banking statements.
Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%.
Still think it's no big  deal???
Copied from SNOPES.com <http://snopes.com/>
1. snopes.com: Debt  Free America Act<http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp> ...
Is the U.S. government  proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or banking  transactions?...It is true.  The bill is HR -4646 introduced by US Rep Peter  deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is  to sneak it in after the...
  ...moved beyond proposing studies and submitted the Debt Free America Act (H.R.  4646), a bill calling for the implementation of a scheme to  pay down the...
  ...[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.).  His "Debt Free America Act" (H.R. 4646) would impose a 1 percent "transaction tax" on every financial  transaction...
Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:24:58 GMT http://www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/debtfree.asp

Social Security Changes: HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
Fwd: Fw: SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES(Glen what do you think of this is it a type of a scam?)
Yes it is:
This email has been circulating before Obama was elected president. Originally it contained Bush's name and Obama has now been substituted for Bush. It originated ingraphic 2006 in regards to a confusing parliamentary occurrence that happens when a motion [in this case a senate bill] has a motion to amend attached. People who vote for or against an amendment might vote the opposite on the final amendment dependent on whether the amendment passed or failed. Its not uncommon for them to be characterized as voting just the opposite of how they actually voted. It's also not uncommon for them to unintentionally vote the opposite of what they intended. Amendments can confuse the entire issue as anyone who has dealt with parliamentary processes [Union, board, legislative meetings etc.] can tell you.
The original 2006 email mischaracterized the Senate Bill at issue and listed the vote from the amendment to the bill as the vote for the actual bill since that vote tended to be more damming for Democrats. The email further muddied the water by intentionally describing the actual bill as a vote for something other than what the bill was about. The amendment was actually a motion to PREVENT former illegal immigrants from obtaining access to social security payments they had made into social security through fake social security numbers. That amendment failed and that amendment would have actually stopped what the original [and current] 2006 email is claiming congress was trying to do. So during the Bush administration the idea of the 2006 email was to taint the democratic senators who actually voted to prevent what the original email claims to be trying to prevent. The list of senators where dropped as was Bush's name and just Obama is listed now as the purpose of the current email versions intent is to misrepresent him alone and to promote xenophobia.
To see a more current example of how motions and amendments can confuse things click here. [warning it gets even more confusing] The same thing is being practiced in Republican 'ROBO calls' in an attempt to make it appear that democrats are supporting raising the debt limit while opposing spending cuts. [p.s. they aren't but I do.]
graphic (8)

To me, the amazing thing about the whole hard core anti-immigration group and the social security is broke group is they are bumping heads in regards to solving their particular grievances. In 2005 [the last year available] it is believed that illegal immigrants using fake social security numbers paid 5 BILLION DOLLARS into social security. This is money they will never get and it represents a plus for the SS trust fund. A minority use fake ss numbers yet they accounted for that much in 2005? Imagine if we legalized even less than half of the illegal's in this country. Since a majority of illegal immigrants get paid under the table and therefore do not pay either income taxes or social security payments imagine how much tax revenue and ss payments are being avoided. Legalizing even a portion of those illegal immigrants, forcing their employees to properly collect those revenues, could be a great boost to both social;l security trust fund and tax revenues. Take it a step further and think what it would do for the unemployment insurance funds if those employers paid premiums for employees that they now avoid by hiring illegal's and paying them under the table.
naturally I've oversimplified the issue, and obviously I have a slanted point of view on the issue, but if Republicans would occasionally drop the 'hard core, take no prisoner approach' to problem solving and look for solutions we might actually see bipartisan solutions instead of reoccurring long term campaign slogans [hot button issues: abortion, immigration, regulations, gay marriage, etc.,]. Identifying the problems is not the same as solving it, we can usually agree on the problem, the problem's solution is seldom obtainable by advocating an extreme or unbending position, compromise moves us closer to a final resolution while unbending stances just guarantees that the problem will continue to exist and therefore the political benefits of always having a hot button issue to whip out every four years.
       GlennDL                              
 
Related links:
The above was in response to the following e-mail:tu
----- Original Message -----REMEMBER THIS IS A HOAX----- 
From:
To: Glenn Littrell
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2011 2:48 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fw: SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES(Glen what do you think of this is it a type of a scam?)
SOCIAL SECURITY CHANGES
It does not matter if you personally like or dislike Obama.  You need to sign this petition and flood his e-mail box with e-mails that tell him that, even if the House passes this bill, he needs to veto it.  It is already impossible to live on Social Security alone.  If the government gives benefits to 'illegal' aliens who have never contributed, where does that leave those of us who have paid into Social Security all our working lives?
As stated below, the Senate voted this week to allow 'illegal' aliens access to Social Security benefits.   Attached is an opportunity to sign a petition that requires citizenship for eligibility to that social service.
Instructions are below.  If you don't forward the petition and just stop it, we will lose all these names.
If you do not want to sign it, please just forward it to everyone you know.
Thank you!
To add your name, click on 'forward'..  Address it to all of your email correspondents, add your name to the list and send it on.
IMPORTANT NOTE:  When the petition hits 1,500, it is up to you to send it to< REFERENCE DELETED gdl else, it will not be sent.
PETITION for President Obama:
Dear Mr. President:
We, the undersigned, protest the bill that the Senate voted on recently which would allow illegal aliens to access our Social Security.  We demand that you and all Congressional representatives require citizenship as a pre-requisite for social services in the United States .
1. Mary PETITIONERS DELETED gdl

If you don't forward the petition and just stop it, we will lose all these names.
If you do not want to sign it, please just forward it to everyone you know.
Thank you!  Just think every time that the list hits 1,500 in all the forwarded
e-mails, this petition will be sent not just by a thousand petitioners, but rather
THOUSANDS of petitioners!
To add your name, click on 'forward'.
Add your name to the bottom of the list, then
Address it to all of your email correspondents and send..
________________________________________

Military Pay: HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
While part of this chain e-mail [original below] is true it has been and is obviously still being used to appeal to sentiment as a way of stealing mailing list and dishonestly maligning people:    [note: some versions of the chain mail identify C.Williams the actress and some reference President Obama, both incorrectly]
The true part:
  • A Cindy Williams did write an editorial criticizing military pay in comparison to civilian pay. She did serve as assistant director for national security in the Congressional Budget Office, but wrote her criticism after leaving office.
  • An airmen did write a response disputing her claims.
  • The airmen attributed in the chainmail did write the original version which has changed much since he wrote it.
That is where the truth starts and ends. That is also all that a spammer needs to get your attention and hook you.
Now for just some of the falsehoods, inaccuracies, and lying:
  • It was not the Cindy Williams [actress] of Laverne and Shirley fame as claimed in some variations of the chainmail. Over the years the actress, a supporter of the military, has received repeated hate mail because of the circulation of this letter.
  • The letter and the events referenced occurred in 2000. Before the war in Afghanistan. [Obviously the airmen was not about to deploy]
  • The real author of the criticisms of military pay, Cindy Williams, was not appointed by President Obama as recent versions of the chainmail claim. She served 1994 to 1997. This is another dishonest and malicious attempt to demonize the current president. I have looked for versions of the email that might blame Bush for her appointment but apparently spammers might have an ideological preference.
Whether this chainmail is re-circulated as a ploy to steal your mailing list or as a means of poisoning your attitude toward our president, it is malicious, dishonest and not worthy of continued circulation. 
Read more at:
References:

----- Original Message ----- REMEMBER THIS IS A HOAX

From:To:Sent: Friday, December 31, 2010 4:03 PM
Subject: FW: Military Pay

MILITARY PAY

if you get this more than once, feel honored that you know more than one person who supports our military and appreciates what they do.
If you don't forward it, you don't deserve their sacrifice.
CINDY WILLIAMS was appointed as an Assistant Director for NATIONAL SECURITY in the Congressional Budget Office.....
Military Pay  
This is an Airman's response to Cindy Williams' editorial piece in the Washington Times about MILITARY PAY, it should be printed in all newspapers across America .  
Ms. Cindy William  wrote a piece for the Washington Times denouncing the pay raise(s) coming service members' way this year citing that she stated a 13% wage increase was more than they deserve.  
A young airman from Hill AFB responds to her article below. He ought to get a bonus for this.  
"Ms  Williams:
I just had the pleasure of reading your column, "Our GI's earn enough" and I am a bit confused. Frankly, I'm wondering where this vaunted overpayment is going, because as far as I can tell, it disappears every month between DFAS (The Defense Finance and Accounting Service) and my bank account. Checking my latest earnings statement I see that I make $1,117.80 before taxes per month. After taxes, I take home $874.20.  When I run that through the calculator, I come up with  an annual salary of $13,413.60 before taxes, and $10,490.40 after.  
I work in the Air Force Network Control Center where I am part of the team responsible for a 5,000 host computer network. I am involved with infrastructure segments, specifically with Cisco Systems equipment. A quick check under jobs for "Network Technicians" in the Washington , D.C. Area reveals a position in my career field, requiring  three years experience in my job. Amazingly, this job does NOT pay $13,413.60 a year. No, this job is being offered at $70,000 to $80,000 per annum............ I'm sure you can draw the obvious conclusions.  
Given the tenor of your column, I would assume that you NEVER had the pleasure of serving your country in her armed forces.  
Before you take it upon yourself to once more castigate congressional and DOD leadership for attempting to get the families in the military's lowest pay brackets off of WIC and food stamps, I suggest that you join a group of deploying soldiers headed for AFGHANISTAN ; I leave the choice of service branch up to you. Whatever choice you make though, opt for the SIX month rotation: it will guarantee you the longest possible time away from your family and friends, thus giving you full "deployment experience.."
As your group prepares to board the plane, make sure to note the spouses and children who are saying good-bye to their loved ones. Also take care to note that several families are still unsure of how they'll be able to make ends meet while the primary breadwinner is gone. Obviously they've been squandering the "vast" piles of cash the government has been giving them.  
Try to deploy over a major holiday; Christmas and Thanksgiving are perennial favorites. And when you're actually over there, sitting in a foxhole, shivering against the cold desert night, and the flight sergeant tells you that there aren't enough people on shift to relieve you for chow, remember this: trade whatever MRE's (meal-ready-to-eat) you manage to get for the tuna noodle casserole or cheese tortellini, and add Tabasco to everything. This gives some flavor.  
Talk to your loved ones as often as you are permitted; it won't be nearly long enough or often enough, but take what you can get and be thankful for it. You may have picked up on the fact that I disagree with most of the points you present in your open piece.  
But, tomorrow from KABUL, I will defend to the death your right to say it.  
You see, I am an American fighting man, a guarantor of your First Amendment right and every other right you cherish...On a daily basis, my brother and sister soldiers worldwide ensure that you and people like you can thumb your collective noses at us, all on  a salary that is nothing short of pitiful and under conditions that would make most people cringe. We hemorrhage our best and brightest into the private sector because we can't offer the stability and pay of civilian companies.  
And you, Ms. Williams, have the gall to say that we make more than we deserve?  
A1C Michael Bragg,  Hill AFB AFNCC  
IF YOU AGREE,
PLEASE PASS THIS ALONG TO
AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE AND SHOW YOUR SUPPORT OF THE AMERICAN FIGHTING MEN AND WOMEN.  
THANK YOU!!!!!!!!!!

ACLU sues to on military headstones and prayer: HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
Sorry, this is not true....it is a hoax. 
For details visit: http://www.snopes.com/politics/religion/cemetery.asp or http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/a/aclu-markers.htm
What’s true is:
"The ACLU and  the Americans United for Separation of Church and State filed a suit to convince the Department of Veterans Affairs to agree to allow family members to choose from 38 different  religious symbols for headstones to represent the variety of faiths practiced in the US." 
in other words they fought for a broader policy, not a more restrictive one.     GlennDL
Besides the ‘dishonesty in this email notice the instructions: ‘There is nothing attached. Just send this to people in your address book.’  Well this too is a lie because I counted over 75 addresses contained in the ‘To:’ and ‘Cc:’ sections each occurrence of Forwarding. 75 addresses that I could hijack as well as anyone receiving this chain e-mail. 75 addresses that the originator and any other spammers could hijack as well.
----- Original Message ----Remember this is a hoax-
From:
To:
Sent: Saturday, May 15, 2010 1:47 PM
Subject: FW: I am honored to do this



Did you know that the ACLU has filed a suit to have all military cross-shaped headstones removed and another suit to end prayer from the military completely..
They're making great progress. The Navy Chaplains can no longer mention Jesus' name in prayer thanks to the ACLU.
I'm not breaking this one.
If I get it a 1000 times, I'll forward it a 1000 times!
Let us pray...
Prayer chain for our Military... Don't break it!
Please send this on after a short prayer. Prayer for our soldiers Don't break it!
Prayer:


'Lord, hold our troops in your loving hands Protect them as they protect us Bless them and their families for the selfless acts they perform for us in our time of need.    Amen.'
Prayer Request: When you receive this, please stop for a moment and say a prayer for our troops around the world.
There is nothing attached. Just send this to people in your address book.
Do not let it stop with you. Of all the gifts you could give a Marine, Soldier, Sailor, Airman, & others deployed in harm's way, prayer is the very best one.
GOD BLESS YOU FOR PASSING IT ON!

The movie "Corpus Christi" is due to be released this... : HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
Sorry folks, we've been duped again. This hoax/chainmail has been around since 1986. For verification check out these links:
  1. Any time you see an E-Mail that says forward this on to:
    ' 10 ' (or however many) of your friends, sign this petition, or you'll get bad/good luck, you'll see something funny on your screen after you send it, or whatever, it almost always has an E-Mail tracker program attached that tracks the cookies and E-Mails of those folks you forward to.
    The host sender is getting a copy each time it gets forwarded and then is able to get lists of 'active' E-Mail addresses to use in SPAM E-Mails, or sell to other spammers.  Even when you get emails that demand you send the email on if you' re not ashamed of God/Jesus ......that's E-mail tracking and they're playing on our conscience.  These people don't care how they get your email addresses - just as long as they get them.  Also, emails that talk about a missing child or a child with an incurable disease "how would you feel if that was your child"....E-mail Tracking!!!  Ignore them and don't participate!
  2. Almost all E-Mails that ask you to add your name and forward on to others are similar to that mass letter years ago that asked people to send business cards to the little kid in  Florida  who wanted to break the Guinness Book of Records for the most cards. All it was, and all any of this type of E-Mail is, is a way to get names and 'cookie' tracking information for telemarketers and spammers - - to validate active E-Mail accounts for their own profitable purposes.
Do yourself a favor and STOP adding your name(s) to those types of listings regardless how inviting they might sound!...or make you feel guilty if you don't!....it' s all about getting email addresses - nothing more!
You may think you are supporting a GREAT cause, but you are NOT! 
Instead, you will be getting tons of junk mail later and very possibly a virus attached! Plus, we are helping the spammers get rich! Let's not make it easy for them!  Just look at all the exposed addresses below, that without a fancy tracking cookie I could just right click on and add to my mailing list. [I counted 135]
If you must send something on then create a new email, paste the text [not the addresses] into it and send it with your name in the 'To:' section and everyone else in the 'Bcc:' section. This way you get a copy and everyone else only sees their address and yours as the rest of your email list is hidden. 
GlennDL
----- Original Message ----remember this is a hoax-
From:
To:
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 10:47 AM
Subject: FW: Going beyond disrespect....
>     Going beyond disrespect .
>
>     The movie "Corpus Christi" is due to be released this June to August.  A disgusting film set to appear in America later this year depicts Jesus and his disciples as homosexuals!
> As a play, this has already been in theatres for a while.  It's called "Corpus Christi" which means "The Body of Christ".
>
>     It's revolting mockery of our Lord.  But we can make a difference.
>
>     That's why I am sending this e-mail to you..
> If you do send this around, we just might be able to prevent this film from showing in America.  Let's stand for what we believe in and stop the mockery of Jesus Christ our Savior.  Where do we stand as Christians?  At the risk of a bit of inconvenience, I'm forwarding this to all I think would appreciate it, too.
>
>     Please help us prevent such offenses against our Lord.  There is no petition to sign, no time limit, or minimum number of people to send this to..  It will take you less than 2 minutes!
> If you are not interested and do not have the 2 minutes it will take to do this, please don't complain when God does not have time for you because He is far busier than we are.  Hey, it's worth a shot!
> Apparently, some regions in Europe have already banned the film.  All we need is a lot of prayer and a lot of e-mails.
>
>     JUST GET THE WORD OUT

A Mirror or a 2-Way Glass? : HOAX

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
Sorry, this one is false, as well intentioned as it may be the "No space, leave the place." advice may lead you to pass up a really good deal on that little black dress.
The first question the police woman/speaker ask is "...how many of you know for sure that the seemingly ordinary mirror hanging on the wall is a real mirror..." well the first clue is that its 'hanging on the wall' pull it from the wall and see if there's a hole in the wall or if you can see backing on the mirror or can you see through it? If the mirror is not 'set into the wall', like a window, it would be easily detectable and therefore ineffective.
Second clue: cup your hands and put your face against your hands to see if any light comes from behind the glass. no light no 'transparent mirror."
The finger test only proves the quality of the mirror. High quality, industrial/technological equipment, mirrors are made from a single layer process that makes them more accurate, but weaker. Cheaper, regular, mirrors are made from two layers giving them added strength. The extra layer of glass creates the space between your finger and its image.
Its a shame really. Whoever put this email together [originally] went to a lot of trouble: even included some professional looking illustrations. Makes you wonder why send out a chain mail that isn't true? Well here's the reason: to steal your email list. The next time you get a chain e-mail look in the "To:" address box above and then look at the "----- Original Message -----" section below, then look at the "Cc:" and "To:" section below that. There’s a lot of addresses aren’t there. Every time this message is 'forwarded' a new set of valid addresses are included. These emails are eventually intercepted with hundreds of addresses and those addresses are sold and shared by "SPAMMERS". [This email was forwarded twice and already exposed 34 addresses.]
So about 80% of these 'chain' e-mails are a scam, most are untrue because the truth is not as inflammatory and therefore less likely to get you to forward it. Your more likely to forward a lie such as "Obama is a socialist Muslim who molest children..." than "Obama passes Wall Street Reform that protects main street from Wall Street..."

To see the urban myths site debunking of this email visit: http://www.snopes.com/crime/warnings/mirror.asp
The original message follows. REMEMBER this is a hoax:
tu


----- Original Message -----
From: [addresses removed for security reasons]To: [addresses removed for security reasons]Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 12:07 PM
Subject: FW: FYI


Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:29:40 -0800
From: [addresses removed for security reasons]Subject: FW: FYI
To: [addresses removed for security reasons]
[note from GlennDL: the two pictures demonstrating the ‘test’ described below have been removed for copywrite reasons.]

2 - WAY GLASS  IMAGE

MIRROR  IMAGE
A Mirror or a 2-Way Glass?

How can you tell when you are in a room, restroom, motel etc. with a mirror or a 2-way glass?
Here's how: I thought it was quite interesting! And I know in about 30 seconds you're going to do what I did and find the nearest mirror.
Do you know how to determine if a mirror is 2-way or not? A policewoman who travels all over the US and gives seminars and techniques for businesswomen passed this on.
When we visit toilets, bathrooms, hotel rooms,changing rooms, etc., how many of you know for sure that the seemingly ordinary mirror hanging on the wall is a real mirror, or actually a 2-way mirror (i.e., they can see you, but you can't see them)? There have been many cases of people installing 2-way mirrors in female changing rooms . It is very difficult to positively identify the surface by looking at it.
So, how do we determine with any amount of certainty what type of mirror we are looking at?
Just conduct this simple test: Place the tip of your fingernail against the reflective surface and if there is a GAP between your fingernail and the image of the nail, then it is GENUINE mirror. However, if your fingernail DIRECTLY TOUCHES the image of your nail, then BEWARE! IT IS A 2-WAY MIRROR!
"No Space, Leave the Place" So remember, every time you see a mirror, do the "fingernail test." It doesn't cost you anything.
REMEMBER. No Space, Leave the Place:
Ladies: Share this with your girlfriends, sisters, daughters, etc.
Men: Share this with your wives, daughters, daughters-in-law, mothers, girlfriends and/or friends.

vain
gettingold (2)b

Onion Myth (HOAX) Just Isn’t Cutting It.

(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
The following information is in response to a popular Chain E-mail [see ‘Original Message’ section below]
[print in red/bold and graphics are usually a link to a reference or source article]
The Chain E-Mail/eRumor is FALSE:  It is a Hoax! 
From TruthOrFiction website
The Truth: 
There is no medical evidence that onions attracts viruses.  Onions have been mythically thought to ward off diseases since the days of the bubonic plague in the middle ages.   The
Vetinfo.com web site does warn that onions are unsafe for dogs and included the tasty vegetable on their list of toxins for dogs.
Left over onions, alone, may not be toxic but can easily pick up contamination from preparation utensils.  
FoodHygieneTraining.com, a website in the United Kingdom offering expert food safety tips, suggests using different cutting boards when preparing meals and vegetables, to prevent cross-contamination.    The web site also warns that bacteria, viruses and parasites can grow in a matter of 20 minutes on a cutting board that was used for uncooked meat if not cleaned properly. It is not difficult for onions and other vegetables to pick up  such microorganism that are invisible to the naked eye.  Natural enzymes in vegetables may even inhibit growth.
If stored improperly, onions can eventually go bad.  The National Onion Association posted suggestions on their web site regarding the storage of unprepared onions recommending that be stored in a cool dry place where air can be allowed to circulate.  Depending on the type, onions can be last in storage between 30 to 180 days.  They also said that "Chopped or sliced onions can be stored in a sealed container in your refrigerator for up to 7 days."                                           goto TruthOrFiction Website for more

The myth extends both to the negative [as far back as 1855] and positive [1900] rumors about onions. Both extremes could lead to serious unintended results if taken too literally:
From the Snopes.com urban myth website which list the Chain E-Mail/eRumor as FALSE:
image
image

Original Message: remember this is a HOAX!
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 19:05:15 +0000
From:
Subject: Fwd: Onions

Subject:


Fw: Onions
I found this very surprising. KellyMcK (8)
ONIONS -- Who Would've  Thought?
  In 1919 when the  flu killed 40 million people, there was a Doctor who visited many  farmers to see if he could help them combat the flu. Many of the farmers  and their family had contracted it, and many  died.
     The  doctor came upon one farmer, and to his surprise,  everyone in the  household was very healthy.  When the doctor asked what the farmer  was doing that was different, the wife replied that she had placed an  unpeeled onion in a dish in the rooms of the home (probably only two  rooms back then).  The doctor couldn't believe it and asked if he  could have one of the onions and place it under the microscope.   She gave him one, and when he did this, he did find the flu virus  in the onion.  It obviously absorbed the bacteria, therefore,  keeping the family  healthy.
     Now,  I heard this story from my hairdresser in AZ.  She said that  several years ago many of her employees were coming down with the flu  and so were many of her customers. The next year she placed several  bowls with onions around in her shop.  To her surprise, none of her  staff got sick. It must work... (And no, she is not in the onion  business.)
     The  moral of the story is, buy some onions and place them in bowls around  your home.  If you work at a desk, place one or two in your office  or under your desk or even on top somewhere..  Try it and see what  happens.  We did it last year, and we never  got the  flu.
     If  this helps you and your loved ones from getting sick, all the better.   If you do get the flu, it just might be a mild case...Whatever,  what have you to lose?  Just a few bucks on  onions!!!
     Now  there is a P.S. to this, for I sent it to a friend in Oregon who  regularly contributes material to me on health issues.  She replied  with this most interesting experience about onions:  Thanks for the  reminder. I don't know about the farmer's story...but I do know that I  contracted pneumonia, and needless to say I was very ill.  I came  across an article that said to cut both ends off an onion.  Put one  end on a fork, and then place the forked end into an empty jar...placing  the jar next to the sick patient at night.  It said the onion would  be black in the morning from the germs.  Sure enough, it happened  just like that...the onion was a mess, and I began to feel  better.
     Another  thing I read in the article was that onions and garlic placed around the  room saved many from the black plague years ago.  They have  powerful antibacterial, antiseptic  properties.
     This  is the other note:  LEFTOVER ONIONS ARE POISONOUS!  I have  used an onion which has been left in the fridge.  Sometimes I don't  use a whole one at one time, so I save the other half for later.   Now with this info, I have changed my mind.  I will buy  smaller onions in the  future.
     I  had the wonderful privilege of touring Mullins Food Products, makers of  mayonnaise.  Mullins is huge, and is owned by 11 brothers and  sisters in the Mullins family.  My friend, Jeanne, is the CEO.   Questions about food poisoning came up, and I wanted to share what  I learned from a chemist.  The guy who gave us our tour is named  Ed.  He's one of the brothers.  Ed is a chemistry expert and  is involved in developing most of the sauce formula.  He's even  developed sauce formula for McDonald's. Keep in mind that Ed is a food  chemistry whiz.
     During  the tour, someone asked if we really needed to worry about mayonnaise.   People are always worried that mayonnaise will spoil.  Ed's  answer will surprise you.  Ed said that all commercially-made mayo  is completely safe.  "It doesn't even have to be refrigerated.   No harm in refrigerating it, but it's not really necessary."   He explained that the pH in mayonnaise is set at a point that  bacteria could not survive in that environment.  He then talked  about the quintessential picnic, with the bowl of potato salad sitting  on the table and how everyone blames the mayonnaise when someone gets  sick.
     Ed  says that when food poisoning is reported, the first thing the officials  look for is when the 'victim' last ate ONIONS and where those onions  came from (in the potato salad?).  Ed says it's not the mayonnaise  (as long as it's not homemade mayo) that spoils in the outdoors.   It's probably the onions, and if not the onions, it's the  POTATOES.
     He  explained, onions are a huge magnet for bacteria, especially uncooked  onions.  You should never plan to keep a portion of a sliced  onion.
He says it's not even safe if you  put it in a zip-lock bag and put it in your  refrigerator.
     It's  already contaminated enough just by being cut open and out for a bit,  that it can be a danger to you (and doubly watch out for those onions  you put on your hotdogs at the baseball  park!)
  Ed says if you  take the leftover onion and cook it like crazy you'll probably be okay,  but if you slice that leftover onion and put it on your sandwich, you're  asking for trouble.  Both the onions and the moist potato in a  potato salad will attract and grow bacteria faster than any commercial  mayonnaise will even begin to break  down.
     So,  how's that for news?  Take it for what you will.  I (the  author) am going to be very careful about my onions from now on.   For some reason, I see a lot of credibility coming from a chemist  and a company that produces millions of pounds of mayonnaise every  year.
     Also,  dogs should never eat onions..  Their stomachs cannot metabolize  onions.
     Please  remember it is dangerous to cut onions and try to use it to cook the  next day.  It becomes highly poisonous for even a single night and  creates toxic bacteria which may cause adverse stomach infections  because of excess bile secretions and even food  poisoning.

Missouri Law On Illegals: EXPLANATION

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
While I have not researched the Missouri Law or the references in the article mentioned I will point out that, as the information is presented in this email, there are several differences in the two laws that might explain why one was acceptable and one not. I am sure there are more differences but two primary differences are:
  • the Arizona Law puts police officers in in the position of having to enforce provisions of the law that could lead to 'profiling'. In spite of the claims that the law specifically states profiling is not allowed there is language and instructions that does not clarify how the law is to be carried out without profiling. The Arizona produced training video for law enforcement, available online, is even more ambiguous in its instructions.
  • The Missouri law instructs the verification of immigration status for "any person arrested" the Arizona law says any person suspected, but does not explain 'suspected' in a unambiguous manner. To check the status of someone arrested and someone walking down the street is two significantly different things. One makes since but the other belongs in Russia when it was communist, or the south during slavery.
In the case of the Arizona law the end result will be that more legal immigrants, native born citizens, and African-Americans in Arizona will be profiled than illegal immigrants.
                                                                              GlennDL                               see more
The above was in response to the following e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 8:22 PM
Subject: FW: Missouri law on illegals


Missouri set the bar!
SO WHY IS EVERYBODY SO UPSET ABOUT ARIZONA???
Simple solutions to not so complex problems!
The "Show Me" state has once again showed us how it should be done.
They need more publication and exposure on this. Let's pass it around.
In 2007, Missouri placed on the ballot a proposed constitutional amendment designating English as the Official language of Missouri. Nearly 90% voted in favor! English became the official language for ALL governmental proceeding in Missouri. It also means no individual has the right to demand government services in a language OTHER than English. We need to take a lesson from that!
In 2008 a measure was passed that requires our Highway Patrol and other law enforcement officials to verify the immigration status of any person arrested, and inform federal authorities if the person is found to be here illegally. It allows Missouri law enforcement offices to receive training to enforce federal immigration laws. (Laws that the federal government is NOT enforcing!!)
The bill makes it clear that illegal immigrants will NOT have access to taxpayer benefits such as food stamps and health care through Missouri HealthNET. In 2009 a measure was passed that ensures Missouri's public institutions of higher education do NOT award financial aid to individuals who are here illegally. The law also requires all post-secondary institutions of higher education to annually certify to the Missouri Dept. of Higher Education that they have NOT knowingly
awarded financial aid to students who are unlawfully present in the United States.
So while Arizona has made national news for its new law, it is important to remember Missouri has been proactive in addressing this growing problem. Missouri has sent a clear message that illegal immigrants are NOT welcome in our state and they are certainly NOT welcome to receive public benefits at the cost of
Missouri taxpayers! Article in "The Ozarks Sentinel" Editorial Opinion - Nita Jane Ayres, May 13, 2010.
Missouri Ahead of the Game in Dealing with Illegal Immigrants
PLEASE PASS THIS AROUND - MISSOURI DID NOT GET "BASHED" FOR THEIR LAW, SO WHY IS ARIZONA????

Shock To NBC: CRITIQUE

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
The reference to an NBC poll is inconclusive. There have been over time, and in 2004 when this chain e-mail first appeared several polls taken by not just NBC but several media outlets. This particular chain mail has morphed from its original form which was in reference to the daughter of a murder victim and progressed to being about ‘In God We Trust’, ‘…under God’, ‘Do you believe in Christ’, ‘…are you religious’ etc. The reference to NBC appears to imply something that is since irrelevant and seems to imply some nefarious plot by NBC, since the ‘poll’ numbers and questions cited are not from the NBC polls in particular. As usual the information in the email, while claiming to be in favor of Christianity actually presents an inaccurate premise and conclusion that is deceptive in nature, to prove a point in an unchristian manner.
The issue of whether the word God should remain in American culture by remaining on our money is ludicrous. Culture is not defined by government. American culture is a mixture of many definable and unfathomable things. God could only be removed from our culture by us. The issue here appears to be more about separation of church and state. That is an issue that goes beyond this chain mail’s capabilities. It is also an issue better covered in a separate argument, but in the limited reference to this chain mail I would point out the the founding fathers words, beliefs and deeds point to the separation of religion from the state as being a Christian concept. 
What interest me is if 86% of Americans are Christian then why is it necessary to put 'In God We Trust' on our money? Does that validate what is in our heart? Does that prove we are a Christian nation? How is that not idolatry? Isn’t that just beating our chest and gnashing our teeth in a show of piety? When Christ was asked about paying taxes to the Romans Christ inquired to the likeness and inscription on the coin. The likeness of Caesar was on the coin and Christ response wasn't that his own likeness should be on the coin. [“Render unto Caesar the things which are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” (Matthew 22:21).]
In this country it isn't supposed to be about 'majority rules' if it was then the minority would have no rights. Rights are available to everyone whether in the majority or not. Many of these rights were identified by the founding fathers as inalienable rights which mean among other things that they are NOT defined by man or governments. One of these inalienable rights protects those who wish to worship as well as those who do not want to. It isn't about catering to the wishes of the minority, its about recognizing the rights of everyone. 
As for the instructions not to respond because '...I don't want to know one way or the other. By me forwarding it you know how I feel..." let me just say by me replying you know how I feel.  
p.s. I realize that this is a chain mail that has been forwarded and that this quoted statement is not necessarily the sentiments of the sender directed at me, but my point is that I am always open to the ideals, thoughts, jokes etc. that are sent to me, but I always retain the right to respond.  In this case this particular chain mail has been around for many years in many forms and I have many times in the past just deleted it but these chain mails go on forever and at some point you start feeling that you have to respond if you disagree with some or all of it.   Thank you, GlennDL
The above was in response to the following e-mail:
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Friday, November 27, 2009 7:22 PM
Subject: FW: Shock to NBC

Shock to NBC
This is not sent for discussion. 
If you agree, forward it.  If you don't, delete it. I don't want to know one way or the other.  By me forwarding it, you know how I feel.
I'll bet this was a surprise to NBC.
NBC POLL
Do you believe that the word God should stay in American culture?
NBC this morning had a poll on this question.. They had the highest Number of responses that they have ever had for one of their polls, and the Percentage was the same as this:
86% to keep the words, IN God We Trust and God in the Pledge of Allegiance
14% against
That is a pretty 'commanding' public response.
I was asked to send this on if I agreed or delete if I didn't .....
Now it is your turn. It is said that 86% of Americans believe the word God should stay.
Therefore, I have a very hard time understanding why there is such a mess about having 'In God We Trust' on our money and having God in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Why is the world catering to this 14%?   The majority should rule and understand that the media is biased to sell print and video.
AMEN!
If you agree, pass this on , if not, simply delete.
In God We Trust


"The Nation Which Forgets Its Defenders Will Itself Be Forgotten"
President Calvin Coolidge


FYI: Chain Mail Hoaxes~Update

by Glenn Littrell

For years I’ve been telling Internet users to stop forwarding ‘chain’ emails, finally an endorsement of this advice from SNOPES [courtesy of Mary C. Cook]:

Advice From Snopes

By now, I suspect everyone is familiar with www.snopes.com and/or www.truthorfiction.com for determining whether information received via email is just that:  true/false or fact/fiction. Both are excellent sites**. Below is their advice for us.

1) Any time you see an E-Mail that says forward this on to '10' of your friends, sign this petition, or you'll get bad luck, good luck, or whatever, it almost always has an E-Mail tracker program attached that tracks the cookies and E-Mails of those folks you forward to. The host sender is getting a copy each time it gets forwarded and then is able to get lists of 'active' E-Mails addresses to use in SPAM E-Mails, or sell to other spammers.
2) Almost all E-Mails that ask you to add your name and forward on to others are similar to that mass letter years ago that asked people to send business cards to the little kid in Florida who wanted to break the Guinness Book of Records for the most cards.  All it was, and all any of this type of E-Mail is, a way to get names and ' cookie' tracking information for telemarketers and spammers - - to validate active E-Mail accounts for their own profitable purposes.
You can do your friends and family members a GREAT favor by sending this information to them; you will be providing a service to your friends, and will be rewarded by not getting thousands of spam E-Mails in the future!
If you have been sending out (FORWARDING) the above kinds of E-Mail, now you know why you get so much SPAM!
Do yourself a favor and STOP adding your name(s) to those types of listings regardless how inviting they might sound!
You may think you are supporting a GREAT cause, but you are NOT in the long run. Instead, you will be getting tons of junk mail later! Plus, we are helping the spammers get rich! Let's stop making it easy for them!

Also: E-Mail petitions are NOT acceptable to Congress or any other organization
. To be acceptable, petitions must have a signed signature and full address of the person signing the petition.

What to do if you do want to send information to others:   how to send information to your mailing list without exposing yourself or your mailing list.

So what do we do?  If you receive something forwarded to you it is my suggestion that you don't open it, don't forward it and you tell everyone on your mailing list to do the same. 

If you want to pass something along then:

  1. create a new message

  2. copy the text of what you want to pass along, not the addresses or "To" and "From" info.

  3. paste it into the new message

  4. put your address in the "To" field

  5. put everyone else's address in the 'bcc' field, not the 'cc' field. 

This way the only address you share with your mailing list and the world is yours, the 'bcc' field hides everyone else's address.  Putting your email list in the bcc: field when forwarding doesn’t hide your email list because the tracker program is still in the ‘forwarded’ copy.

**additional fact checking sites are:

http://factcheck.org/
http://www.breakthechain.org/index.html 
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/fact-checker/ 
http://politifact.com/ 
http://www.about.com/ 

               gdl

Pictures From London, Shocking: CRITIQUE

by Glenn Littrell
(archived from www.glennlittrell.org)
This one I will not brand as a hoax, because in regards to the pictures, the signs and the protest they are true [one picture may actually be from another protest but that's of little consequence here], but I would point out some relevant information even though it might not seem to be relevant by some.
I do not have a population number for Muslims in Britain but I would suggest that the five or six hundred that were reported at this protest where not representative of the much larger Muslim population in general. To be sure most Muslims were likely just as upset by the event that led to this protest but the overwhelming majority did not participate and did not approve of the demonstration. A protest by 500 idiots in another country is only newsworthy here on a slow news day.
I point this out for two reasons:
  1. To say these 500 protestors are representative of all Muslims, as the article states, is like saying that the members of the Westboro Baptist Church in Kansas is representative of Christian's in America. Who is the WBC? They’re the group that pickets at the funerals of fallen soldiers, hurling epitaphs at the families and condemning their sons and daughters for fighting for their nation. Two upcoming events they have scheduled are: This Saturday [tomorrow] in Iowa, "St. Patrick's Catholic Church 4330 St. Patrick Drive WBC to picket the funeral of Capt. [name removed], cut off in his youth fighting a losing battle against the Lord his God. We will remind this nation and those yet still alive that the Lord is killing these soldiers for serving a sinful and rebellious sodomite nation..." and also Saturday in Liberty, Missouri, "Pleasant Valley Baptist Church 1600 North 291 Highway WBC to picket the funeral of Sgt. [name removed]. God hates America and is sending her troops home in body bags. We will stand outside his funeral to warn the living that there is a hell, there is a day of judgment, and the destruction of this nation is imminent. Every person going into that funeral should be on their knees thanking God that they are yet alive and have yet a little space to repent. Instead, they go worship the dead body and the limp idol that lays over the casket..." now do these people at WBC represent all Christians in America, are they any less dangerous than those Muslims? There are idiots and morons everywhere.
  2. Now having said that I am well aware of the arguments that are put forth that if most Muslims are peaceful and not in agreement with these protestors why don't they condemn their actions? Well they do, but unfortunately when these condemnations are reported we tend to ignore them because we are so outraged at the protestors, but the sad truth is they are seldom reported. I would also point out that there is no major outcry from prominent Christian leaders in America in regards to WBC's actions, and when there is it too gets little coverage. Here is the link for some of the responses from Muslims in regards to the "Religion of Peace" demonstration in England:
http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/muslimprotest.asp  scroll to the bottom portion of the article.
I'm sure that some will point out that the WBC is nothing like these Muslim protestors. That they would never resort to violence against America, but they are just one group of homegrown nuts. There are plenty more and to that I would say:
  1. Timothy McVeigh [Oklahoma City bomber]
  2. visit there website: http://www.godhatesfags.com/schedule.html  and http://www.godhatesfags.com/written/wbcinfo/godhatesfags.html  to see the extent of their hate.
  3. Eric Robert Rudolph [Olympic Park Bomber]: Rudolph …also confessed to the bombings of an abortion clinic in the Atlanta suburb of Sandy Springs on January 16, 1997; the Other side Lounge of Atlanta lesbian bar in Atlanta on February 21, 1997, injuring five; and an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama on January 29, 1998, killing Birmingham Police Officer and part-time clinic security guard Robert Sanderson, and critically injuring nurse Emily Lyons. Rudolph's bombs were made of dynamite surrounded by nails which acted as shrapnel.

Hate is a terrible thing, lets oppose it not embrace it.

It’s The War On Terrorism, Not The War On Muslims.
Does anyone stop to think that our troops are fighting alongside Muslims everyday in Iraq and Afghanistan? How does widespread condemnation of the religion of the people we are supposed to be liberating affect their attitude towards our troops and our efforts in their country? All it does is raise the level of distrust. By lumping all Muslims together with the religious fanatics we just encourage the long established fears, not just in Muslim nations, that we only want to exploit, convert and rule them.
The above was written in response to the following chain e-mail [pictures have been removed because of their offensive nature]:
----- Original Message -----
From:To:Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2010 7:24 PM
Subject: FW: Pictures from London - shocking

Pray for them.
Just don't let those lamebrain idiots build that mosque near Ground Zero,,,,,it cannot happen....that would be an overt slap in the face to America,,,,,,
Darn scary stuff!






Wake Up Call!
Peaceful as long as you obey.

Pictures  from   London  ~ this is beyond scary...

Makes you wonder doesn't it....can you imagine having a Christian, Jewish, or for that matter any other religious demonstration against Islam in downtown   Baghdad !
These pictures are of Muslims marching through the STREETS OF LONDON during their recent ' Religion of Peace Demonstration. '

[pictures removed]

Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful  Muslims?!
You need to forward this one to everyone!  These pictures tell it  all!
Muslims have stated that England will be the first country they take  over!
These are pictures not shown on American TV or in American Newspapers, but were forwarded by a Canadian friend who thought all Americans ought to know!